[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180629150104.GE15656@rkaganb.sw.ru>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:01:05 +0300
From: Roman Kagan <rkagan@...tuozzo.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>,
Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@...hat.com>,
Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: x86: hyperv: use get_vcpu_by_vpidx() in
kvm_hv_flush_tlb()
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 04:14:53PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> VP_INDEX almost always matches VCPU id and get_vcpu_by_vpidx() is fast,
> use it instead of traversing full vCPU list every time.
>
> To support the change switch kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask() to checking
> vcpu_id instead of vcpu index,
I'm afraid you can't do this: vcpu_id (== apic id) can be sparse, i.e.
it's not very well suited for bitmaps and can exceed the max number of
vcpus.
Roman.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists