[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180629154101.GI9643@red-moon>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:41:01 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: host: pci-hyperv: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with
GFP_KERNEL in new_pcichild_device
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:53:28PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> new_pcichild_device() is not called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at new_pcichild_device() is:
> [1] new_pcichild_device() <- pci_devices_present_work()
> pci_devices_present_work() is only set in INIT_WORK().
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> new_pcichild_device() calls kzalloc with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which waits busily for allocation.
> GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL
> to avoid busy waiting.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to pci/hv for v4.19, thanks.
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> index 0fe3ea1..289e31d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ static struct hv_pci_dev *new_pcichild_device(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus,
> unsigned long flags;
> int ret;
>
> - hpdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*hpdev), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + hpdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*hpdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!hpdev)
> return NULL;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists