[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGM2reZV7tG0FEZV94_-6EXxBEwXkZSuoSn93M=8s4VmRNDCPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:55:59 -0400
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To: osalvador@...hadventures.net
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, jack@...e.cz, jglisse@...hat.com,
Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>, bhe@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, dave.hansen@...el.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm/sparse: start using sparse_init_nid(), and
remove old code
> besides this first for_each_present_section_nr(), what about writing a static inline
> function that returns next_present_section_nr(-1) ?
>
> Something like:
>
> static inline int first_present_section_nr(void)
> {
> return next_present_section_nr(-1);
> }
Good idea, will add it, thank you.
Pavel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists