[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <673faf24-7069-0195-d8b8-dd50a54b2e7f@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:31:11 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/split_lock: Disable #AC for split locked
accesses
On 06/29/2018 07:33 AM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> + ac_split_lock_off [X86]
> + Disable #AC exception for split locked accesses.
> + By default, this feature is enabled in kernel.
FWIW, I detest the "ac_" nomenclature this patch spreads around. It's
marginally passable for in-kernel use, but I'd rather see it stopped
where it reflects out to user-visible places. Let's give this a logical
name, like:
split_lock_detect=off
Powered by blists - more mailing lists