[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24734cab3a622e17a4f6408b63ad8ecdc7b496e6.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:50:09 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
linux@...linux.org.uk, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
mingo@...hat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, feng.tang@...el.com,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 17:30 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 12:43 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> Taking above into consideration, I think we may just remove the legacy
> code from mfld.c and mrfld.c and see what happen.
>
> If you can tell me points to test, I can prepare patches to remove and
> test on both Medfiled and Merrifield platforms (Penwell and Tangier
> SoCs
> respectively).
I'm almost have a patch series. Tested for now for Intel Merrifield
(Tangier SoC).
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists