[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <198b646c-1472-a5d1-65c3-ba1a99ac1387@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:37:34 -0700
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arc/Kconfig: include mm/Kconfig inside "ARC system
configuration"
On 06/29/2018 01:29 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 06/29/2018 12:28 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> Hi Randy,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:34:55AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 06/29/2018 06:42 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>>> Otherwise mm configuration options show up in the top level menu.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> In which config tool does this matter?
>>>
>>> For xconfig, it seems to me that this patch hides the MM menu, whereas
>>> before this patch, the MM menu is easy to find (although it could
>>> use some kind of heading).
>> With xconfig the menu gets into the top right pane when you click on "ARC
>> architecture configuration", similar to what one gets on x86 with
>> "Processor type and features" or "Kernel features" on ARM.
>>
>> With menuconfig it looks a bit more prominent, note that mm options are
>> between "ARC Architecture Configuration" and "Networking support":
> I know. I ran all 4 of menuconfig, nconfig, xconfig, and gconfig.
>
> I would prefer to see Memory Management options have its own top-level
> menu, but that's a different patch. Then menuconfig would look like this:
>
>
>
> │ │ *** Compiler: arc-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0 *** │ │
> │ │ General setup ---> │ │
> │ │ [*] Enable loadable module support ---> │ │
> │ │ [*] Enable the block layer ---> │ │
> │ │ ARC Architecture Configuration ---> │ │
> │ │ Memory Management options ---> │ │
> │ │ (11) Maximum zone order │ │
> │ │ [*] Networking support ---> │ │
> │ │ Device Drivers ---> │ │
> │ │ Bus Support --->
Indeed I realized after applying that we are cluttering the mm stuff inside ARC.
So I don't see real net improvement with this patch/
> but that "Maximum zone order" needs to be moved or taken care of somehow.
Right this is mm specific option which is provided for by arch. And even a
redirector like ARCH_HAS_FORCE_MAX and moving this to generic mm won't cut it
since the option values are arch specific !
-Vineet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists