[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180629151618.1da8d00c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 15:16:18 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the scsi
tree
Hi all,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:54:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>
> lib/percpu_ida.c
>
> between commit:
>
> acf3ff616ee2 ("scsi: Remove percpu_ida")
>
> from the scsi tree and commit:
>
> 0c4d6e08c775 ("lib/percpu_ida.c: don't do alloc from per-CPU list if there is none")
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just removed the file, but clearly the akpm-current
> tree commit could be removed) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the scsi tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists