[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180701153123.756542422@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun,  1 Jul 2018 18:01:53 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 35/85] parisc: Move setup_profiling_timer() out of init section
3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
[ Upstream commit 01f56832cfb6fcc204e7203f46841b6185ebd574 ]
No other architecture has setup_profiling_timer() in the init section,
thus on parisc we face this section mismatch warning:
 Reference from the function devm_device_add_group() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -422,8 +422,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct ta
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
-int __init
-setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
+int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
