[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180701153123.756542422@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 18:01:53 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 35/85] parisc: Move setup_profiling_timer() out of init section
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
[ Upstream commit 01f56832cfb6fcc204e7203f46841b6185ebd574 ]
No other architecture has setup_profiling_timer() in the init section,
thus on parisc we face this section mismatch warning:
Reference from the function devm_device_add_group() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -422,8 +422,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct ta
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
-int __init
-setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
+int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists