[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180701083648.5de5sbskp3atqat2@redbean.fritz.box>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 10:36:48 +0200
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modsign: log module name in the event of an error
+++ Joe Perches [29/06/18 21:04 -0700]:
>On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 17:53 +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> Now that we have the load_info struct all initialized (including
>> info->name, which contains the name of the module) before
>> module_sig_check(), make the load_info struct and hence module name
>> available to mod_verify_sig() so that we can log the module name in the
>> event of an error.
>[]
>> diff --git a/kernel/module-internal.h b/kernel/module-internal.h
>[]
>> +extern int mod_verify_sig(const void *mod, struct load_info *info,
>> + unsigned long *_modlen);
>> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
>[]
>> @@ -2778,7 +2758,7 @@ static int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, int flags)
>> memcmp(mod + info->len - markerlen, MODULE_SIG_STRING, markerlen) == 0) {
>> /* We truncate the module to discard the signature */
>> info->len -= markerlen;
>> - err = mod_verify_sig(mod, &info->len);
>> + err = mod_verify_sig(mod, info, &info->len);
>
>This is the only place this is used correct?
>So why pass info and info->member?
>
>info should be enough
Ah yeah you're right, thanks!
Jessica
Powered by blists - more mailing lists