linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 065/101] clk: at91: PLL recalc_rate() now using cached MUL and DIV values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180701160759.764063131@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun,  1 Jul 2018 18:21:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@...mianowicz.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 065/101] clk: at91: PLL recalc_rate() now using cached MUL and DIV values

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@...mianowicz.com>

commit a982e45dc150da3a08907b6dd676b735391704b4 upstream.

When a USB device is connected to the USB host port on the SAM9N12 then
you get "-62" error which seems to indicate USB replies from the device
are timing out. Based on a logic sniffer, I saw the USB bus was running
at half speed.

The PLL code uses cached MUL and DIV values which get set in set_rate()
and applied in prepare(), but the recalc_rate() function instead
queries the hardware instead of using these cached values. Therefore,
if recalc_rate() is called between a set_rate() and prepare(), the
wrong frequency is calculated and later the USB clock divider for the
SAM9N12 SOC will be configured for an incorrect clock.

In my case, the PLL hardware was set to 96 Mhz before the OHCI
driver loads, and therefore the usb clock divider was being set
to /2 even though the OHCI driver set the PLL to 48 Mhz.

As an alternative explanation, I noticed this was fixed in the past by
87e2ed338f1b ("clk: at91: fix recalc_rate implementation of PLL
driver") but the bug was later re-introduced by 1bdf02326b71 ("clk:
at91: make use of syscon/regmap internally").

Fixes: 1bdf02326b71 ("clk: at91: make use of syscon/regmap internally)
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcin Ziemianowicz <marcin@...mianowicz.com>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c |   13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
@@ -132,19 +132,8 @@ static unsigned long clk_pll_recalc_rate
 					 unsigned long parent_rate)
 {
 	struct clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
-	unsigned int pllr;
-	u16 mul;
-	u8 div;

-	regmap_read(pll->regmap, PLL_REG(pll->id), &pllr);
-
-	div = PLL_DIV(pllr);
-	mul = PLL_MUL(pllr, pll->layout);
-
-	if (!div || !mul)
-		return 0;
-
-	return (parent_rate / div) * (mul + 1);
+	return (parent_rate / pll->div) * (pll->mul + 1);
 }

 static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,