[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180701160758.029963454@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 18:21:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
syzbot <syzbot+ec3986119086fe4eec97@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
John Muir <john@...ir.com>, Csaba Henk <csaba@...ster.com>,
Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 022/101] fuse: dont keep dead fuse_conn at fuse_fill_super().
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
commit 543b8f8662fe6d21f19958b666ab0051af9db21a upstream.
syzbot is reporting use-after-free at fuse_kill_sb_blk() [1].
Since sb->s_fs_info field is not cleared after fc was released by
fuse_conn_put() when initialization failed, fuse_kill_sb_blk() finds
already released fc and tries to hold the lock. Fix this by clearing
sb->s_fs_info field after calling fuse_conn_put().
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a07a680ed0a9290585ca424546860464dd9658db
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+ec3986119086fe4eec97@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: 3b463ae0c626 ("fuse: invalidation reverse calls")
Cc: John Muir <john@...ir.com>
Cc: Csaba Henk <csaba@...ster.com>
Cc: Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v2.6.31
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/inode.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,7 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_
err_put_conn:
fuse_bdi_destroy(fc);
fuse_conn_put(fc);
+ sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
err_fput:
fput(file);
err:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists