lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180702095121.67bc61ef@bbrezillon>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:51:21 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...tlin.com>, richard@....at,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
        marek.vasut@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ubi: provide a way to skip CRC checks

Hi Artem,

On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 10:30:25 +0300
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 09:40 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c
> > index d4b2e87..e9e9ecb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/kapi.c
> > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ struct ubi_volume_desc *ubi_open_volume(int ubi_num, int vol_id, int mode)
> >  	desc->mode = mode;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&ubi->ckvol_mutex);
> > -	if (!vol->checked) {
> > +	if (!vol->checked && !vol->skip_check) {
> >  		/* This is the first open - check the volume */
> >  		err = ubi_check_volume(ubi, vol_id);
> >  		if (err < 0) {  
> 
> Did you deliberately did not add a similar check to 'vol_cdev_write()' ?
> You want to skip checking on load but do have the checking after volume update ?

Yep, it's on purpose, I asked Quentin to keep the test on the update
volume path.

> Looks a bit inconsistent to me. At the very least deserves a comment in
> 'vol_cdev_write()' about why 'skip_check' flag is ignored there.

Well, I thought checking the CRC just after updating the volume made
sense, just to make sure things were written correctly on the medium.
Let's add a comment explaining why we keep the check here, unless you
see a strong reason to get rid of this check in the update path.

Regards,

Boris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ