[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180702121528.GM19043@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:15:28 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, willy@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 PATCH 5/5] x86: check VM_DEAD flag in page fault
On Mon 02-07-18 10:45:03, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 30/06/2018 00:39, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Check VM_DEAD flag of vma in page fault handler, if it is set, trigger
> > SIGSEGV.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> > index 9a84a0d..3fd2da5 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> > @@ -1357,6 +1357,10 @@ static inline bool smap_violation(int error_code, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > bad_area(regs, error_code, address);
> > return;
> > }
> > + if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_DEAD)) {
> > + bad_area(regs, error_code, address);
> > + return;
> > + }
>
> This will have to be done for all the supported architectures, what about doing
> this check in handle_mm_fault() and return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV ?
We already do have a model for that. Have a look at MMF_UNSTABLE.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists