linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 11/27] venus: core,helpers: add two more clocks found in Venus 4xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e5b99cec-6401-32ee-57d2-7feafaaa5a11@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:01:17 +0300
From:   Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To:     Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, vgarodia@...eaurora.org,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/27] venus: core,helpers: add two more clocks found
 in Venus 4xx

Hi Alex,

Thanks for the review!

On 07/02/2018 11:45 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:34 AM Stanimir Varbanov
> <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Add two more clocks for Venus 4xx in core structure and create
>> a new power enable function to handle it for 3xx/4xx versions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.h    |  4 +++
>>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.h |  2 ++
>>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c    | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/venc.c    | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  5 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>

<snip>

>> @@ -1131,15 +1137,21 @@ static int vdec_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  static __maybe_unused int vdec_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>         struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +       int ret;
>>
>> -       if (core->res->hfi_version == HFI_VERSION_1XX)
>> +       if (IS_V1(core))
>>                 return 0;
>>
>> -       writel(0, core->base + WRAPPER_VDEC_VCODEC_POWER_CONTROL);
>> +       ret = venus_helper_power_enable(core, VIDC_SESSION_TYPE_DEC, true);
>> +
>> +       if (IS_V4(core))
>> +               clk_disable_unprepare(core->core0_bus_clk);
>> +
>>         clk_disable_unprepare(core->core0_clk);
>> -       writel(1, core->base + WRAPPER_VDEC_VCODEC_POWER_CONTROL);
>>
>> -       return 0;
>> +       ret |= venus_helper_power_enable(core, VIDC_SESSION_TYPE_DEC, false);
> 
> Is it safe to OR two potentially different error messages, at the risk
> of getting a third one that is different?

venus_helper_power_enable can return zero or ETIMEDOUT, but ...

> 
> If venus_helper_power_enable() fails, shouldn't we just exit early and
> signify that the suspend operation failed?
> 

I had the same comment from Tomasz, hence maybe I'm wrong :) so I will
re-work that and will exit early if error.

-- 
regards,
Stan