[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180702145727.GC65296@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:57:27 -0700
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
alexis.berlemont@...il.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, ralf@...ux-mips.org, paul.burton@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] perf probe: Support SDT markers having
reference counter (semaphore)
* Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com> [2018-06-28 10:52:09]:
> With this, perf buildid-cache will save SDT markers with reference
> counter in probe cache. Perf probe will be able to probe markers
> having reference counter. Ex,
>
> # readelf -n /tmp/tick | grep -A1 loop2
> Name: loop2
> ... Semaphore: 0x0000000010020036
>
> # ./perf buildid-cache --add /tmp/tick
Would this perf buildid-cache work if the executable is stripped of
symbols?
> # ./perf probe sdt_tick:loop2
> # ./perf stat -e sdt_tick:loop2 /tmp/tick
> hi: 0
> hi: 1
> hi: 2
> ^C
> Performance counter stats for '/tmp/tick':
> 3 sdt_tick:loop2
> 2.561851452 seconds time elapsed
Also can we document how to use SDT markers with perf under perf-probe
or perf-build-cache?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists