[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3301ef51-e35f-1273-6efc-8c11f31a945c@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:52:43 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/host/pci-quirks: Only reset USB bus on NVIDIA devices
[Taking stable@ out of CC. I just started to use `git send-email`.]
Dear Alan,
Am 02.07.2018 um 17:45 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2018, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
>> Currently, on the AMD board Asus F2A85-M Pro there is a 100 ms delay as
>> the USB bus of each of the two OHCI PCI devices is reset. As a 50 ms
>> delay is done per the USB specification.
>>
>> Commit c6187597 (OHCI: final fix for NVIDIA problems (I hope))
>> unconditionally does the bus reset for
>> all chipsets, while it was only doen for NVIDIA chipsets before.
>
> I don't follow this at all. Prior to that commit, the bus reset (i.e.,
>
> writel(control & OHCI_CTRL_MASK, base + OHCI_CONTROL);
>
> ) was performed unconditionally for _all_ controllers. (However, the
> 50-ms delay was used only for NVIDIA hardware.) Following that commit,
> the reset is performed for all controllers, but only if the HCFS
> bitfield is nonzero.
>
>> As it should not be needed for non-NVIDIA chipsets, only do the reset
>> for Nvidia devices.
>
> Therefore this reasoning is wrong.
True. Thank you for checking that.
>> Tested on Asus F2A85-M PRO and ASRock E350M1. The USB keyboard works and
>> the LUKS passphrase can be entered.
>
> Unfortunately, there is a wide variety of OHCI controller hardware
> available. Something that works on one or two controllers might not
> work on another.
The problem is, that currently 100 ms sleep is over 10 % of the overall
execution time of the Linux kernel here. So I really like to not sleep
if it’s not needed.
> Besides, doesn't it seem like a bad idea to reset the controller while
> leaving devices on the USB bus in whatever state they happened to be?
Yes, it’s probably not optimal.
I wonder if the reset is needed, if the firmware has already initialized
the device.
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists