[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad342918-1534-a499-ae25-63c8d8bff1d1@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 18:18:26 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/host/pci-quirks: Only reset USB bus on NVIDIA devices
Dear Alan,
Am 02.07.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Am 02.07.2018 um 17:45 schrieb Alan Stern:
>>> On Sun, 1 Jul 2018, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Currently, on the AMD board Asus F2A85-M Pro there is a 100 ms delay as
>>>> the USB bus of each of the two OHCI PCI devices is reset. As a 50 ms
>>>> delay is done per the USB specification.
>>>>
>>>> Commit c6187597 (OHCI: final fix for NVIDIA problems (I hope))
>>>> unconditionally does the bus reset for
>>>> all chipsets, while it was only doen for NVIDIA chipsets before.
>>>
>>> I don't follow this at all. Prior to that commit, the bus reset (i.e.,
>>>
>>> writel(control & OHCI_CTRL_MASK, base + OHCI_CONTROL);
>>>
>>> ) was performed unconditionally for _all_ controllers. (However, the
>>> 50-ms delay was used only for NVIDIA hardware.) Following that commit,
>>> the reset is performed for all controllers, but only if the HCFS
>>> bitfield is nonzero.
>>>
>>>> As it should not be needed for non-NVIDIA chipsets, only do the reset
>>>> for Nvidia devices.
>>>
>>> Therefore this reasoning is wrong.
>>
>> True. Thank you for checking that.
>>
>>>> Tested on Asus F2A85-M PRO and ASRock E350M1. The USB keyboard works and
>>>> the LUKS passphrase can be entered.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, there is a wide variety of OHCI controller hardware
>>> available. Something that works on one or two controllers might not
>>> work on another.
>>
>> The problem is, that currently 100 ms sleep is over 10 % of the overall
>> execution time of the Linux kernel here. So I really like to not sleep
>> if it’s not needed.
>
> It would be nice to execute the probes in parallel; that would reduce
> the total delay to 50 ms. However, that is the subject of a separate
> discussion.
>
>>> Besides, doesn't it seem like a bad idea to reset the controller while
>>> leaving devices on the USB bus in whatever state they happened to be?
>>
>> Yes, it’s probably not optimal.
>>
>> I wonder if the reset is needed, if the firmware has already initialized
>> the device.
>
> The devices on the bus need to be reset, because the OS has no idea of
> what they are and what the firmware has them doing.
>
> For example, the firmware may have assigned bus address 2 to a
> keyboard. But the OS can initialize the devices in a different order,
> and it might want to assign bus address 2 to a USB drive. Then you'd
> have two devices trying to use the same address at the same time, which
> would not be a good thing.
Understood.
So, what would be a way forward? Add a whitelist for boards or chipsets
not needing the 50 ms delay?
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists