[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180702113255.1f7504e2@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 11:32:55 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] docs/mm: add boot time memory management docs
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 17:54:55 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Both bootmem and memblock have pretty good documentation coverage. With
> some fixups and additions we get a nice overall description.
>
> v2 changes:
> * address Randy's comments
>
> Mike Rapoport (11):
> mm/bootmem: drop duplicated kernel-doc comments
> docs/mm: nobootmem: fixup kernel-doc comments
> docs/mm: bootmem: fix kernel-doc warnings
> docs/mm: bootmem: add kernel-doc description of 'struct bootmem_data'
> docs/mm: bootmem: add overview documentation
> mm/memblock: add a name for memblock flags enumeration
> docs/mm: memblock: update kernel-doc comments
> docs/mm: memblock: add kernel-doc comments for memblock_add[_node]
> docs/mm: memblock: add kernel-doc description for memblock types
> docs/mm: memblock: add overview documentation
> docs/mm: add description of boot time memory management
So this seems like good stuff overall. It digs pretty deeply into the mm
code, though, so I'm a little reluctant to apply it without an ack from an
mm developer. Alternatively, I'm happy to step back if Andrew wants to
pick the set up.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists