[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180702125150.a7b69e852d9b7bd52f1f451d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:51:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
Cc: steven.sistare@...cle.com, daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
mhocko@...e.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: teach dump_page() to correctly output poisoned
struct pages
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:05:36 -0400 Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com> wrote:
> If struct page is poisoned, and uninitialized access is detected via
> PF_POISONED_CHECK(page) dump_page() is called to output the page. But,
> the dump_page() itself accesses struct page to determine how to print
> it, and therefore gets into a recursive loop.
>
> For example:
> dump_page()
> __dump_page()
> PageSlab(page)
> PF_POISONED_CHECK(page)
> VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(PagePoisoned(page), page)
> dump_page() recursion loop.
>
> Fixes: f165b378bbdf ("mm: uninitialized struct page poisoning sanity checking")
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Thanks. I added a cc:stable to make sure this gets into 4.17.x.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists