[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180702134845.c4f536dead5374b443e24270@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 13:48:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, willy@...radead.org,
ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 PATCH 4/5] mm: mmap: zap pages with read mmap_sem for
large mapping
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 16:05:02 +0200 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri 29-06-18 20:15:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> [...]
> > Would one of your earlier designs have addressed all usecases? I
> > expect the dumb unmap-a-little-bit-at-a-time approach would have?
>
> It has been already pointed out that this will not work.
I said "one of". There were others.
> You simply
> cannot drop the mmap_sem during unmap because another thread could
> change the address space under your feet. So you need some form of
> VM_DEAD and handle concurrent and conflicting address space operations.
Unclear that this is a problem. If a thread does an unmap of a range
of virtual address space, there's no guarantee that upon return some
other thread has not already mapped new stuff into that address range.
So what's changed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists