linux-kernel - Re: 4.17.x won't boot due to "x86/boot/compressed/64: Handle 5-level paging boot if kernel is above 4G"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:26:09 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert@...hat.com>,
        linux-x86_64@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        bero@...dev.ch
Subject: Re: 4.17.x won't boot due to "x86/boot/compressed/64: Handle 5-level
 paging boot if kernel is above 4G"

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 11:03:07AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:21:50PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:44:03PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:24:49PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > > > 2018-07-01 23:32 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Gilbert <bgilbert@...hat.com>:
> > > > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 05:15:59PM -0400, Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
> > > > >> 4.17 kernels built with the CoreOS Container Linux toolchain and kconfig,
> > > > >> up to and including 4.17.3, fail to boot on AMD64 running in (at least)
> > > > >> QEMU/KVM.  No messages are shown post-GRUB; the VM instantly reboots.
> > > > >> Reverting commit 194a9749c73d ("x86/boot/compressed/64: Handle 5-level
> > > > >> paging boot if kernel is above 4G") fixes it.  I've attached our kernel
> > > > >> config for reference, and am happy to test patches, provide sample QCOW
> > > > >> images, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Also see https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200385 ,
> > > > 
> > > > 0a1756bd2897951c03c1cb671bdfd40729ac2177 is acting up
> > > > too with the same symptoms
> > > 
> > > I tracked it down to -flto in LDFLAGS. I'll look more into this.
> > 
> > -flto in LDFLAGS screws up this part of paging_prepare():
> 
> Where is that coming from? The LTO patches are not upstream.
> 
> And I don't see any LTO usage in the main line.

Apparently some distros try to hack it around:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200385

I'm amazed that it kinda worked for them.


> > 	/* Copy trampoline code in place */
> > 	memcpy(trampoline_32bit + TRAMPOLINE_32BIT_CODE_OFFSET / sizeof(unsigned long),
> > 			&trampoline_32bit_src, TRAMPOLINE_32BIT_CODE_SIZE);
> 
> 
> > In particular, relocation for trampoline_32bit_src solved in the wrong
> > way. Without -flto, we have rip-realtive address load:
> > 
> >   982d30:	48 8d 35 09 cc ff ff 	lea    -0x33f7(%rip),%rsi        # 97f940 <trampoline_32bit_src>
> > 
> > With -flto we have immediate load:
> > 
> >   982cf0:	48 c7 c6 f0 f8 97 00 	mov    $0x97f8f0,%rsi
> 
> Strange.
> 
> Can you add some RELOC_HIDE()s and see if that helps?

Nope. No difference in generated code.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov