[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180703210100.jpxz4xwwwgvjqycv@ninjato>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:01:00 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>,
Michael Shych <michaelsh@...lanox.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] i2c: smbus: add unlocked __i2c_smbus_xfer variant
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:51:52AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are a couple of users that could benefit from an unlocked variant
> of i2c_smbus_xfer. In response to [1] I dusted off an old series that I
> have had in a branch for a while that adds such a beast. It also converts
> over some users in the i2c-mux department.
>
> There are a couple of remaining candidates in i2c/busses/i2c-amd756-s4882.c
> and i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2-s4985.c, but frankly, those are just too nasty.
> Why do they unregister the root adapter and then continue to use it? I
> dare not touch that code...
>
> Anyway, this series looks like a nice cleanup to me, and the recent sccb
> patch from Akinobu Mita could also benefit, as indicated by Wolfram [1].
Applied to for-next, thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists