linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 05/13] x86/sgx: architectural structures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5790d6a4-7d30-1ed8-0214-f68f1cb72294@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:22:52 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 05/13] x86/sgx: architectural structures

On 07/03/2018 11:19 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> +enum sgx_cpuid {
> +	SGX_CPUID_CAPABILITIES	= 0,
> +	SGX_CPUID_ATTRIBUTES	= 1,
> +	SGX_CPUID_EPC_BANKS	= 2,
> +};

I made a review comment about these last time.  I don't remember
receiving any kind of response from you on it, or seeing it addressed in
these patches in any kind of way.

I've also seen comments from Thomas that sound really familiar such as
the lack of comments on the paging code or the use of a semaphore to
protect things that don't sleep.  I made very, very similar comments on
the last posting.

Is there a reason that those comments were not addressed?