[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd5f7Xj51ZKoxOWibrx4Bkh-HxkMwjKmEeumZm=WV2ksQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 01:54:48 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Xiongfeng Wang <xiongfeng.wang@...aro.org>, nv@...n.de,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Nikolaus Voss
<nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de> wrote:
> struct i2c_device_id argument of probe() is not used, so use probe_new()
> instead.
>
This makes...
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st_accel_id_table);
...this table obsolete IIUC. At least that's what I did when switched
to ->probe_new() in some drivers.
If I'm mistaken (again? :-) ) I would hear from someone to point me
how it can be used after a switch.
>
> -static int st_accel_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> - const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +static int st_accel_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> struct st_sensor_data *adata;
> @@ -182,7 +181,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver st_accel_driver = {
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(st_accel_of_match),
> .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(st_accel_acpi_match),
> },
> - .probe = st_accel_i2c_probe,
> + .probe_new = st_accel_i2c_probe,
> .remove = st_accel_i2c_remove,
> .id_table = st_accel_id_table,
> };
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists