linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] mmc: core: cd_label must be last entry of mmc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 07:35:54 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "evgreen@...omium.org" <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mmc: core: cd_label must be last entry of mmc_gpio struct

On 3 July 2018 at 04:25, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com> wrote:
>
>> I think either way is OK, since flexible array is used in kernel code quite commonly,
>> so I prefer to make code change as small as possible, the original patch can also prevent
>> similar bug in future. And like below commit Fabio pointed out, it also has same kind
>> of fix: a158531f3c92 ("gpio: 74x164: Fix crash during .remove()"). Thanks.
>
> I am also fine with this patch or the one from Linus.
>
> Maybe Anson's patch could be applied to 4.18-rc as a bug fix and
> Linus' patch could be applied to 4.19-rc1 as a cleanup/improvement?

Good idea!

I have queued up Anson's v2 patch as a fix for 4.18.

Linus, can please re-post a re-based version of your change on top!? I
guess you can add Anson's and Fabio's reviewed by tags for it as well.

Kind regards
Uffe