[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153059814703.143105.275831530209187562@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 23:09:07 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: iivanov@...sol.com, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Fix pmic_gpio_config_get() to be
compliant
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2018-07-02 15:59:39)
> If you do this on an sdm845 board:
> grep "" /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/*spmi:pmic*/pinconf-groups
>
> ...it looks like nonsense. For every pin you see listed:
> input bias disabled, input bias high impedance, input bias pull down, input bias pull up, ...
>
> That's because pmic_gpio_config_get() isn't complying with the rules
> that pinconf_generic_dump_one() expects. Specifically for boolean
> parameters (anything with a "struct pin_config_item" where has_arg is
> false) the function expects that the function should return its value
> not through the "config" parameter but should return "0" if the value
> is set and "-EINVAL" if the value isn't set.
>
> Let's fix this.
>
> From a quick sample of other pinctrl drivers, it appears to be
> tradition to also return 1 through the config parameter for these
> boolean parameters when they exist. I'm not one to knock tradition,
> so I'll follow tradition and return 1 in these cases. While I'm at
> it, I'll also continue searching for four leaf clovers, kocking on
Small typo here.
> wood three times, and trying not to break mirrors.
>
> NOTE: This also fixes an apparent typo for reading
> PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE where the old driver was accidentally
> using "=" instead of "==" and thus was setting some internal
> state when you tried to query PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE. Oops.
Awesome!
>
> Fixes: eadff3024472 ("pinctrl: Qualcomm SPMI PMIC GPIO pin controller driver")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
We should fix the ssbi-gpio/mpp and spmi-mpp drivers too. All those
drivers are designed on the same buggy original driver.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists