[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1530599660.git.nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 08:34:20 +0200
From: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Xiongfeng Wang <xiongfeng.wang@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, nv@...n.de
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] IIO: st_sensors_i2c: improve device enumeration
When trying to instantiate a st_accel_i2c device from an ACPI based
system, I ran into some problems:
For my device, there is no ACPI match table entry, so rather than
creating /allocating a new ACPI HID for the device, I wanted to use an
existing DT table compatible entry via creating an ACPI_DT_NAMESPACE_HID
/PRP0001 HID ACPI entry (see Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt).
This did not work because st_accel_i2c.c bails out if there is a ACPI
node but no ACPI table match. Use device_get_match_data API to get the
right driver data.
acpi_device_get_match_data() currently doesn't return DT compatible
matches. A separate patch is submitted to fix this.
v2:
- use device_get_match_data API as suggested by Andy Shevchenko
- removed syncing DT/I2C table names as Jonathan Cameron pointed out
this would be an ABI change
- converting from probe() to probe_new() is moved into a separate
patch (as suggested by Jonathan Cameron)
Nikolaus Voss (2):
IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Simplify access to driver data
IIO: st_accel_i2c.c: Use probe_new() instead of probe()
drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_i2c.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists