[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbBuxpuAC0PDfFBQ+D_zJu-AmWFNhEWCojr8LAWfO-ootLqEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 03:18:49 -0400
From: Luis Araneda <luaraneda@...il.com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] arm: dts: zynq: remove "zynq" prefix from
compatible property
Hi Michal,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:42 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
> zynq name here is correct which is saying that hardblock is going to be
> described. Without it it is suggesting that hardblock is not used and it
> is for example on zybo with microblaze.
In my opinion, the zynq name is just adding redundant information to
the "xlnx,zynq-7000" value.
Taking the Zybo board, the current compatible property is:
> compatible = "digilent,zynq-zybo", "xlnx,zynq-7000";
I'm proposing to change it to:
> compatible = "digilent,zybo", "xlnx,zynq-7000";
(I know I must keep the old value too, I'm simplifying)
In the case of a Zybo board with a microblaze, the property could be:
> compatible = "digilent,zybo", "xlnx,microblaze";
That would allow to differentiate between zynq and microblaze.
I have no problem on dropping the patch if you like. There might be
something that I'm not seeing or a use case that I'm missing.
Thanks,
Luis Araneda.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists