[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21810770-ebf2-d21e-aeef-b106849bce2f@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:21:30 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hpa@...or.com,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>,
Manoj Gupta <manojgupta@...gle.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>, sedat.dilek@...il.com,
tstellar@...hat.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
mawilcox@...rosoft.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, acme@...hat.com,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, "J. Kiszka" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
rostedt@...dmis.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
akataria@...are.com, brijesh.singh@....com,
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, thomas.lendacky@....com,
Thiebaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>, mjg59@...gle.com,
joe@...ches.com, andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] x86: paravirt: make native_save_fl extern inline
On 26/06/18 18:22, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:13 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>> Ok!
>>
>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
>>
>> What's the planned upstreaming route for these patches/fixes?
>
> While the fix is mainly for paravirt, 2/3 of the patches exclusively
> touch arch/x86, so I think they should go up in the x86 tree (as
> opposed to paravirt's), if you would be so kind. hpa mentioned not
> handling merges in https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/14/903, so I reached
> out to you and tglx.
As there is no paravirt tree the x86 one seems to be appropriate. :-)
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists