linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] Coccinelle: atomic_as_refcounter: Use nested disjunctions in two SmPL rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d70ae28-69c2-4d7a-2151-6df704694d0e@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:45:54 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] Coccinelle: atomic_as_refcounter: Use nested disjunctions
 in two SmPL rules

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 19:21:28 +0200

Six function names were specified for a search of function calls
by the means of a disjunction in two rules of a script for
the semantic patch language.
Refactor them into two groups so that the SmPL code repetition
could be reduced a bit.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 .../coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci | 36 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci
index 372ae99591fd..63cbe866c99f 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/atomic_as_refcounter.cocci
@@ -18,17 +18,15 @@ identifier fname2 =~ "(?:call_rcu|de(?:l|stroy)|(?:queue|schedule)_work)";
 @@
 
 (
- atomic_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
+(atomic_dec_and_test@p1
+|atomic_long_dec_and_test@p1
+|atomic64_dec_and_test@p1
+|local_dec_and_test@p1
+)                           (&(a)->x)
 |
- atomic_dec_and_lock@p1(&(a)->x, ...)
-|
- atomic_long_dec_and_lock@p1(&(a)->x, ...)
-|
- atomic_long_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
-|
- atomic64_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
-|
- local_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
+(atomic_dec_and_lock@p1
+|atomic_long_dec_and_lock@p1
+)                           (&(a)->x, ...)
 )
 ...
 (
@@ -53,17 +51,15 @@ identifier fname =~ "free";
 @@
 
 (
- atomic_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
-|
- atomic_dec_and_lock@p1(&(a)->x, ...)
-|
- atomic_long_dec_and_lock@p1(&(a)->x, ...)
-|
- atomic_long_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
-|
- atomic64_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
+(atomic_dec_and_test@p1
+|atomic_long_dec_and_test@p1
+|atomic64_dec_and_test@p1
+|local_dec_and_test@p1
+)                           (&(a)->x)
 |
- local_dec_and_test@p1(&(a)->x)
+(atomic_dec_and_lock@p1
+|atomic_long_dec_and_lock@p1
+)                           (&(a)->x, ...)
 )
 ...
 y=a
-- 
2.18.0