linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] IIO: st_sensors_i2c: improve device enumeration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:18:41 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Xiongfeng Wang <xiongfeng.wang@...aro.org>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        nv@...n.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] IIO: st_sensors_i2c: improve device enumeration

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Nikolaus Voss
> <nikolaus.voss@...wensteinmedical.de> wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand how ->probe_new() is supposed to work
>>> against i2c_id_table, but I don't care for legacy platform data
>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> What I would like to point to is device_get_match_data() API which
>>> should simplify / unify the case how you get driver data.
>>
>>
>> This driver doesn't need any driver data/ platform_data beyond the
>> i2c_id_table name (which has already been matched when probe()/ probe_new()
>> is called), so strictly neither of_match_table nor apci_match_table would be
>> necessary, because i2c DT/ ACPI enumeration also matches against i2c_table
>> names.
>
> Looking at the code I see still calls to acpi_match_data() and of_match_data().
> Instead nowadays better to use device_get_match_data().

You are completely right, sorry. I rewrote and reposted the patch.

> i2c_id_table should be removed from the module device table at least
> (though you may continue to use it internally in the driver).

As I understand it, it is still necessary to make 
i2c_register_board_info() work.

Niko