lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 06:35:57 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     "Gaoming (ming, consumer BG)" <gaoming20@...wei.com>
Cc:     "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Liqingchao (sorp)" <sorp.liqingchao@...wei.com>,
        "Shenchen (harry)" <harry.shen@...wei.com>,
        "miaoxie (A)" <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
        "yangfei (D)" <yangfei39@...wei.com>,
        "Renlipeng (OS driver)" <renlipeng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: [PATCH] ext4: e2fsprogs: fix inode bitmap num not
 integer,incompatible for ancient android devices

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:58:48AM +0000, Gaoming (ming, consumer BG) wrote:
> And can you help me understand *why* such a choice was made?
> -----if there is such a problem in your devices, how will you do? Is there any other choice?
> ----- of course, you cannot format the partition.

You misunderstand my question.  Why was the choice of a blocksize of
1024 made?

I'm trying to understand how many devices, and why any other
manufacture would make, what seems to me, to be a completely insane
choice.

How long has Huawei been using a 1024 byte blocksize?  And why?  And
for how many devices?  Essentially, I'm trying to figure out if this
was a Huawei-specific mistake.

					- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ