[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180703143434.GA4086@wunner.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:34:34 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] PCI: Mask and unmask hotplug interrupts during
reset
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 06:52:47PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> @@ -308,8 +310,17 @@ void pcie_do_fatal_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 service)
> pci_dev_put(pdev);
> }
>
> + hpsvc = pcie_port_find_service(udev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP);
> + hpdev = pcie_port_find_device(udev, PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP);
> +
> + if (hpdev && hpsvc)
> + hpsvc->mask_irq(to_pcie_device(hpdev));
> +
> result = reset_link(udev, service);
>
> + if (hpdev && hpsvc)
> + hpsvc->unmask_irq(to_pcie_device(hpdev));
> +
We've already got the ->reset_slot callback in struct hotplug_slot_ops,
I'm wondering if we really need additional ones for this use case.
If you just do...
if (!pci_probe_reset_slot(dev->slot))
pci_reset_slot(dev->slot)
else {
/* regular code path */
}
would that not be equivalent?
(It's worth noting though that pciehp is the only hotplug driver
implementing the ->reset_slot callback. If hotplug is handled by
a different driver or by the platform firmware, devices may still
be removed and re-enumerated twice.)
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists