lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:53:02 -0700
From:   Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>,
        Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
        Daniel Silsby <dansilsby@...il.com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] dmaengine: dma-jz4780: Separate chan/ctrl registers

Hi Paul,

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 02:32:02PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> @@ -804,9 +818,19 @@ static int jz4780_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	jzdma->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> -	if (IS_ERR(jzdma->base))
> -		return PTR_ERR(jzdma->base);
> +	jzdma->chn_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(jzdma->chn_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(jzdma->chn_base);
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> +	if (!res) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get I/O memory\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	jzdma->ctrl_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(jzdma->ctrl_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(jzdma->ctrl_base);

Could we have this failure case fall back to the existing behaviour
where we only have a single resource covering all the registers? That
would avoid breaking bisection between this patch & the one that updates
the JZ4780 DT.

For example:

	#define JZ4780_DMA_CTRL_OFFSET	0x1000

	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
	if (res) {
		jzdma->ctrl_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
		if (IS_ERR(jzdma->ctrl_base))
			return PTR_ERR(jzdma->ctrl_base);
	} else {
		jzdma->ctrl_base = jzdma->chn_base + JZ4780_DMA_CTRL_OFFSET;
	}

Then you could remove the fallback after patch 13, to end up with the
same code you have now but without breaking bisection.

Most correct might be to move patch 13 to right after this one, so that
the JZ4780-specific fallback can be removed before adding support for
any of the other SoCs.

Thanks,
    Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ