linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/memcpy_mcsafe: Fix copy_to_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hFL4qE1n9jjJa_wuw6nOGQR5vtyqg-vvvbLw9X=9_RvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:02:31 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/memcpy_mcsafe: Fix copy_to_user_mcsafe()
 exception handling

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:30:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Ingo,
>> >
>> > Here is an additional copy_to_iter_mcsafe() fix to address the crash
>> > reported by Ross. This now passes xfstests:generic/323 on my system.
>>
>> The lib/iov_iter fix would need an Acked-by from Al.
>
> I can live with that; I would really like to see some documentation on
> the copy_to_iter_mcsafe(), but that's a separate story.  Incidentally,
> are there any expectations of other callers appearing, or is that
> (and copy_from_iter_flushcache()) YASingleConsumerAPI?

The current cpu architectural detail preventing conversion of the
standard copy_to_iter() path to use the mcsafe flavor is that we can't
use REP MOV for fast copies and instead need to use a software loop so
that any exceptions are recoverable. When / if that is addressed, and
there is no performance difference between the two, it might make
sense to convert more users.

The _flushcache flavor, however, will likely stay limited to a single
consumer for the persistent memory use case.