[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180704064058.1344-1-yehs2007@zoho.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:40:56 +0800
From: Huaisheng Ye <yehs2007@...o.com>
To: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com,
mawilcox@...rosoft.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bart.vanassche@....com, jack@...e.com,
chengnt@...ovo.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] nvdimm/pmem: check the validity of the pointer pfn
From: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>
Some functions within fs/dax don't need to get gfn from direct_access.
Assigning NULL to gfn of dax_direct_access is more intuitive and simple
than offering a useless local variable.
So direct_access needs to check validity of the pointer pfn For NULL
assignment.
Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>
---
drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
index 9d71492..018f990 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
@@ -233,7 +233,8 @@ __weak long __pmem_direct_access(struct pmem_device *pmem, pgoff_t pgoff,
PFN_PHYS(nr_pages))))
return -EIO;
*kaddr = pmem->virt_addr + offset;
- *pfn = phys_to_pfn_t(pmem->phys_addr + offset, pmem->pfn_flags);
+ if (pfn)
+ *pfn = phys_to_pfn_t(pmem->phys_addr + offset, pmem->pfn_flags);
/*
* If badblocks are present, limit known good range to the
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists