[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180704081505.GB1007@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:45:05 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/2] powerpc: Enable CPU_FTR_ASYM_SMT for interleaved
big-cores
Hi Murilo,
Thanks for the review.
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 02:53:46PM -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote:
[..snip..]
> > - /* Initialize CPU <=> thread mapping/
> > + if (has_interleaved_big_core) {
> > + int key = __builtin_ctzl(CPU_FTR_ASYM_SMT);
> > +
> > + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_ASYM_SMT;
> > + static_branch_enable(&cpu_feature_keys[key]);
> > + pr_info("Detected interleaved big-cores\n");
> > + }
>
> Shouldn't we use cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ASYM_SMT) before setting
> > it?
Are you suggesting that we do the following?
if (has_interleaved_big_core &&
!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ASYM_SMT)) {
...
}
Currently CPU_FTR_ASYM_SMT is set at compile time for only POWER7
where running the tasks on lower numbered threads give us the benefit
of SMT thread folding. Interleaved big core is a feature introduced
only on POWER9. Thus, we know that CPU_FTR_ASYM_SMT is not set in
cpu_features at this point.
>
> > +
> > + /* Initialize CPU <=> thread mapping/
> > *
> > * WARNING: We assume that the number of threads is the same for
> > * every CPU in the system. If that is not the case, then some code
> > --
> > 1.9.4
> >
>
> --
> Murilo
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists