linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI LID: increment wakeup count only when notified.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1749498.FF42dzjKYz@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Wed, 04 Jul 2018 12:39:08 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>
Cc:     lenb@...nel.org, ravisadineni@...gle.com,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, tbroch@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        rajatja@...gle.com, bleung@...gle.com, furquan@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ACPI LID: increment wakeup count only when notified.

On Wednesday, June 27, 2018 7:55:02 PM CEST Ravi Chandra Sadineni wrote:
> Because acpi_lid_initialize_state() is called on every system
> resume and it triggers acpi_lid_notify_state() which invokes
> acpi_pm_wakeup_event() for the lid device, the lid's wakeup count is
> incremented even if the lid was not the source of the event that woke up
> the system. That behavior confuses user space deamons using
> wakeup_count to identify the potential system wakeup source. To avoid
> the confusion, only trigger acpi_pm_wakeup_event() in the
> acpi_button_notify() path and don't do that in the
> acpi_lid_initialize_state() path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>
> ---
>  v3:  Change is_notification to signal_wakeup
>  V2: Increment the wakeup count only when the lid is open.
> 
>  drivers/acpi/button.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> index 2345a5ee2dbbc..40ed3ec9fc94c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> @@ -235,9 +235,6 @@ static int acpi_lid_notify_state(struct acpi_device *device, int state)
>  		button->last_time = ktime_get();
>  	}
>  
> -	if (state)
> -		acpi_pm_wakeup_event(&device->dev);
> -
>  	ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&acpi_lid_notifier, state, device);
>  	if (ret == NOTIFY_DONE)
>  		ret = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&acpi_lid_notifier, state,
> @@ -366,7 +363,8 @@ int acpi_lid_open(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_lid_open);
>  
> -static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device)
> +static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device,
> +				 bool signal_wakeup)
>  {
>  	int state;
>  
> @@ -374,6 +372,9 @@ static int acpi_lid_update_state(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	if (state < 0)
>  		return state;
>  
> +	if (state && signal_wakeup)
> +		acpi_pm_wakeup_event(&device->dev);
> +
>  	return acpi_lid_notify_state(device, state);
>  }
>  
> @@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ static void acpi_lid_initialize_state(struct acpi_device *device)
>  		(void)acpi_lid_notify_state(device, 1);
>  		break;
>  	case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_METHOD:
> -		(void)acpi_lid_update_state(device);
> +		(void)acpi_lid_update_state(device, false);
>  		break;
>  	case ACPI_BUTTON_LID_INIT_IGNORE:
>  	default:
> @@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
>  			users = button->input->users;
>  			mutex_unlock(&button->input->mutex);
>  			if (users)
> -				acpi_lid_update_state(device);
> +				acpi_lid_update_state(device, true);
>  		} else {
>  			int keycode;
>  
> 

Applied, thanks!