| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <5B3C2EEF.4080309@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 11:20:31 +0900
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] PM / devfreq: Fix handling of min/max_freq ==
0
Hi Matthias,
On 2018년 07월 04일 08:46, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Commit ab8f58ad72c4 ("PM / devfreq: Set min/max_freq when adding the
> devfreq device") initializes df->min/max_freq with the min/max OPP when
> the device is added. Later commit f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the
> available min/max frequency") adds df->scaling_min/max_freq and the
> following to the frequency adjustment code:
>
> max_freq = MIN(devfreq->scaling_max_freq, devfreq->max_freq);
>
> With the current handling of min/max_freq this is incorrect:
>
> Even though df->max_freq is now initialized to a value != 0 user space
> can still set it to 0, in this case max_freq would be 0 instead of
> df->scaling_max_freq as intended. In consequence the frequency adjustment
> is not performed:
>
> if (max_freq && freq > max_freq) {
> freq = max_freq;
>
> To fix this set df->min/max freq to the min/max OPP in max/max_freq_store,
> when the user passes a value of 0. This also prevents df->max_freq from
> being set below the min OPP when df->min_freq is 0, and similar for
> min_freq. Since it is now guaranteed that df->min/max_freq can't be 0 the
> checks for this case can be removed.
>
> Fixes: f1d981eaecf8 ("PM / devfreq: Use the available min/max frequency")
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - none
>
> Changes in v4:
> - added 'Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>' tag
>
> Changes in v3:
> - none
>
> Changes in v2:
> - handle freq tables sorted in ascending and descending order in
> min/max_freq_store()
> - use same order for conditional statements in min/max_freq_store()
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index 0057ef5b0a98..6f604f8b2b81 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -283,11 +283,11 @@ int update_devfreq(struct devfreq *devfreq)
> max_freq = MIN(devfreq->scaling_max_freq, devfreq->max_freq);
> min_freq = MAX(devfreq->scaling_min_freq, devfreq->min_freq);
>
> - if (min_freq && freq < min_freq) {
> + if (freq < min_freq) {
> freq = min_freq;
> flags &= ~DEVFREQ_FLAG_LEAST_UPPER_BOUND; /* Use GLB */
> }
> - if (max_freq && freq > max_freq) {
> + if (freq > max_freq) {
> freq = max_freq;
> flags |= DEVFREQ_FLAG_LEAST_UPPER_BOUND; /* Use LUB */
> }
> @@ -1122,18 +1122,27 @@ static ssize_t min_freq_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> {
> struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
> unsigned long value;
> + unsigned long *freq_table;
You can move 'freq_table' under 'else' statement.
> int ret;
> - unsigned long max;
>
> ret = sscanf(buf, "%lu", &value);
> if (ret != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> mutex_lock(&df->lock);
> - max = df->max_freq;
> - if (value && max && value > max) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto unlock;
> +
> + if (value) {
> + if (value > df->max_freq) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + } else {
> + freq_table = df->profile->freq_table;
> + /* typical order is ascending, some drivers use descending */
You better to explain what is doing of following code.
How about modifying it as following?
/* Get minimum frequency according to sorting way */
> + if (freq_table[0] < freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1])
> + value = freq_table[0];
> + else
> + value = freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1];
> }
>
> df->min_freq = value;
> @@ -1157,18 +1166,27 @@ static ssize_t max_freq_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> {
> struct devfreq *df = to_devfreq(dev);
> unsigned long value;
> + unsigned long *freq_table;
ditto. You can move 'freq_table' under 'else' statement.
> int ret;
> - unsigned long min;
>
> ret = sscanf(buf, "%lu", &value);
> if (ret != 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> mutex_lock(&df->lock);
> - min = df->min_freq;
> - if (value && min && value < min) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto unlock;
> +
> + if (value) {
> + if (value < df->min_freq) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + } else {
> + freq_table = df->profile->freq_table;
> + /* typical order is ascending, some drivers use descending */
ditto.
/* Get maximum frequency according to sorting way */
> + if (freq_table[0] < freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1])
> + value = freq_table[df->profile->max_state - 1];
> + else
> + value = freq_table[0];
> }
>
> df->max_freq = value;
>
If you agree my comment and modify this patch according to my comment,
feel free to add my review tag.
- Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists