[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTusBM0-E=wAJgRJA7g-RnDi9ts==-M7KezNBwSWnyO=HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 10:47:07 +0800
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] drivers/base: bugfix for supplier<-consumer
ordering in device_kset
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 8:50:38 AM CEST Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > commit 52cdbdd49853 ("driver core: correct device's shutdown order")
> > places an assumption of supplier<-consumer order on the process of probe.
> > But it turns out to break down the parent <- child order in some scene.
> > E.g in pci, a bridge is enabled by pci core, and behind it, the devices
> > have been probed. Then comes the bridge's module, which enables extra
> > feature(such as hotplug) on this bridge.
>
> So what *exactly* does happen in that case?
>
I saw the shpc_probe() is called on the bridge, although the probing
failed on that bare-metal. But if it success, then it will enable the
hotplug feature on the bridge.
Thanks,
Pingfan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists