linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: trusted: Find tpm_chip and use it until module shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180704135235.GA6724@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jul 2018 16:52:35 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        jgg@...pe.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: trusted: Find tpm_chip and use it until module
 shutdown

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:06:23PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 04:51 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:26:55AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > 
> > > OK, I was not sure how that discussion went. I could add myself as
> > > co-maintainer to MAINTAINERS because I anyway need to go through
> > > all of these.
> > > 
> > > If anyone does not vote against, I'll send a patch.
> > > 
> > 
> > For Keys?  That would would be useful to help reduce the workload on 
> > David.
> 
> Well, no, this was for trusted keys, which is the part of the key
> infrastructure that goes via the TPM: The KEYS-TRUSTED part in the
> MAINTAINERs file.  There's still KEYS-ENCRYPTED, KEYS/KEYRING and
> ASYMETRIC KEYS, which don't use the TPM.
> 
> However, I've no objection to consolidating the lot under a larger set
> of maintainers ... I recently agreed to look at the asymmetric key TPM
> patch because it's my area, but it also strays over into crypto,
> keyring and asymmetric keys.

Should 2/2 be rolled through my tree? 1/2 is a tpm patch.

/Jarkko