lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:40:59 +0530
From:   Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:     linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] crypto: Add Qcom prng driver

Hi Stephan,

On 03-07-18, 15:28, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2018, 08:04:31 CEST schrieb Vinod Koul:
> > +static int qcom_rng_read(struct qcom_rng *rng, void *data, size_t max)
> > +{
> > +	size_t currsize = 0;
> > +	u32 *retdata = data;
> 
> How can you be sure that this cast is appropriate? I.e. how is it guaranteed 
> that data is 4-byte aligned?

While reading we check the alignment:

               /* make sure we stay on 32bit boundary */
               if ((max - currsize) < WORD_SZ)
                       break;

> Also, the data variable in qcom_rng_generate is a u8 -- shouldn't this type be 
> used instead of a void?

That does make sense to me. IIRC the read is for a byte. I will check
this and update it

Thanks for the quick review
-- 
~Vinod

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ