[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180704172443.GD6724@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 20:24:43 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 02/13] x86/sgx: add SGX definitions to cpufeature
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 08:48:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2018, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> Subject: x86/sgx: add SGX definitions to cpufeature
>
> The prefix is bogus. Not everything you touch is SGX just because.
>
> The proper prefix is 'x86/cpufeatures:'
> The following sentence starts with an uppercase letter.
>
> And with the proper prefix the subject wants to be something like:
>
> x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX and SGX_LC CPU features
>
> > From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Added X86_FEATURE_SGX and X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC definitions that define the
>
> Add the ...
>
> -> definitions that define
>
> That's redundant.
>
> > bits CPUID level 7 bits for determining whether the CPU supports SGX and
>
> bits ... bits ??
>
> > launch configuration other than the Intel proprietary key. If this the
> > case, IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs (0 < n < 4) are available for defining the
> > root key for enclaves.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Lacks your SOB
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Thanks, will refine!
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists