[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180705055920.19611-1-manfred@colorfullife.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 07:59:14 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: 1vier1@....de, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] ipc: cleanups & bugfixes
Hi,
Dmitry convinced me that I should properly review the initialization
of new ipc objects, and I found another issue.
The series corrects 3 issues with ipc_addid(), and also renames
two functions and corrects a wrong comment.
0001-ipc-reorganize-initialization-of-kern_ipc_perm.id:
Access kern_ipc_perm.id under the IPC spinlock.
My original idea of removing kern_ipc_perm entirely
is not possible, e.g. the proc interface needs the id.
0002-ipc-reorganize-initialization-of-kern_ipc_perm.seq:
Bugfix for the syzbot finding
0003-ipc-util.c-Use-ipc_rcu_putref-for-failues-in-ipc_add:
Bugfix from code review
0004-ipc-Rename-ipcctl_pre_down_nolock.patch:
Comment update & function rename from code review
0005-ipc-rename-ipc_lock-to-ipc_lock_idr:
Function rename from code review
0006-ipc-util.c-correct-comment-in-ipc_obtain_object_che
Comment correction from code review
The patches are lightly tested, especially I have not tested
the checkpoint/restore code or tested the failure cases.
--
Manfred
Powered by blists - more mailing lists