[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA9wgnbK8PHMvksezHqgN1BQZd_+sxXCe85AW+E+cfrcXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 08:51:19 +0100
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@...nel.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [kvmtool test PATCH 24/24] kvmtool: arm: Add support for creating
VM with PA size
On 4 July 2018 at 16:51, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 03:41:18PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Not really. Let's say I want my IPA space split in two: memory covers
>> the low 47 bit, and I want MMIO spanning the top 47 bit. With your
>> scheme, you'd end-up with a 47bit IPA space, while you really want 48
>> bits (MMIO space implemented by userspace isn't registered to the
>> kernel).
>
> That still sounds quite niche for a VM. Does QEMU do that?
Not at 47 bits, but we have RAM up to the 256GB mark, and
MMIO above that (including a large PCI window), so the general
arrangement of having the top end of the IPA space not
necessarily be things we've told the kernel about definitely
exists.
thanks
-- PMM
Powered by blists - more mailing lists