[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6AADFAC011213A4C87B956458587ADB401E2726B@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 08:48:11 +0000
From: "weiyongjun (A)" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"Frieder Schrempf" <frieder.schrempf@...eet.de>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH -next v3] mtd: spinand: fix missing unlock on error
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com> wrote on Wed, 4 Jul 2018
> 09:30:27
> +0000:
>
> > Add the missing unlock before return from function
> > spinand_mtd_(read|write) in the error handling case.
> >
> > Fixes: c898e0526fb6 ("mtd: nand: Add core infrastructure to support SPI
> NANDs")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
> > ---
>
> Thanks for the two fixes over the spinand work. As this code is not
> yet upstream, do you mind if I fold those fixes directly with the
> initial patch?
No, I don't. Feel free to fold them to the initial patch.
Regards,
Wei yongjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists