[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtA_5N_+fiLLcMi7Mx2xDMpxpxZqNdPTWQjZobx5uQ-MtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:32:14 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] track CPU utilization
Hi Peter
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 14:36, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
>
> OK, this looks good I suppose. Rafael, are you OK with me taking these?
>
> I have the below on top because I once again forgot how it all worked;
> does this work for you Vincent?
Yes looks good to me
Thanks
>
> ---
> Subject: sched/cpufreq: Clarify sugov_get_util()
>
> Add a few comments (hopefully) clarifying some of the magic in
> sugov_get_util().
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> cpufreq_schedutil.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists