lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:05:49 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 03/13] x86/sgx: add SGX definitions to msr-index.h

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 11:31:59AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/03/2018 11:19 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> > @@ -479,6 +479,8 @@
> >  #define FEATURE_CONTROL_LOCKED				(1<<0)
> >  #define FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED_INSIDE_SMX	(1<<1)
> >  #define FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED_OUTSIDE_SMX	(1<<2)
> > +#define FEATURE_CONTROL_SGX_ENABLE                      (1<<18)
> > +#define FEATURE_CONTROL_SGX_LE_WR			(1<<17)
> >  #define FEATURE_CONTROL_LMCE				(1<<20)
> 
> Have you run checkpatch.pl on these?  There's a tabs-vs-spaces issue here.

High portion of lines in this file are over 80 characters and have this
same incosistent spacing. I'm not sure if this should be fixed bacause
it would be consistent with the formatting that this file uses...

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ