[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153080829041.5496.6336874857121191833.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 17:31:30 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Cc: kiran.modukuri@...il.com, carmark.dlut@...il.com,
vegard.nossum@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
neilb@...e.com, aderobertis@...rics.net, dhowells@...hat.com,
dja@...ens.net
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] cachefiles: Wait rather than BUG'ing on "Unexpected
object collision"
From: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri@...il.com>
If we meet a conflicting object that is marked FSCACHE_OBJECT_IS_LIVE in
the active object tree, we have been emitting a BUG after logging
information about it and the new object.
Instead, we should wait for the CACHEFILES_OBJECT_ACTIVE flag to be cleared
on the old object (or return an error). The ACTIVE flag should be cleared
after it has been removed from the active object tree. A timeout of 60s is
used in the wait, so we shouldn't be able to get stuck there.
Signed-off-by: Kiran Kumar Modukuri <kiran.modukuri@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/cachefiles/namei.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
index b5d6dd72dfa0..af2b17b21b94 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
@@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ static int cachefiles_mark_object_active(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
pr_err("\n");
pr_err("Error: Unexpected object collision\n");
cachefiles_printk_object(object, xobject);
- BUG();
}
atomic_inc(&xobject->usage);
write_unlock(&cache->active_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists