linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: core: Link consumer with regulator driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180705175343.GB29378@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Jul 2018 19:53:43 +0200
From:   "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Pascal PAILLET-LME <p.paillet@...com>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org" <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: core: Link consumer with regulator driver

On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 05:53:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 02:25:56PM +0000, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote:
> > From: pascal paillet <p.paillet@...com>
> > 
> > Add a device link between the consumer and the driver so that
> > the consumer is not suspended before the driver. The goal is to avoid
> > implementing suspend_late ops in regulator drivers.
> 
> This looks good but I'll wait for Greg's review of the link
> functionality - Greg, is it OK to apply this via the regulator tree or
> do you want a shared branch?

You can take it through the regulator tree, no objection from me:
	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>